Home / News / Technical Forecast: Centrifuge (CFG/USDT) Amid RWA Momentum and Price Correction

Technical Forecast: Centrifuge (CFG/USDT) Amid RWA Momentum and Price Correction

Technical Forecast: Centrifuge (CFG/USDT) Amid RWA Momentum and Price Correction

Current State & Fundamental Backdrop
Right now, CFG is trading around $0.09231, up roughly +6.52% in the last 24 hours—though this modest gain doesn’t erase the pain from recent weeks. The token’s stuck in a pronounced downtrend, sitting well below its major moving averages. What’s more concerning is the anemic volume and shallow order books, which means we could see sudden, sharp moves in either direction without much of a cushion. On the brighter side, CFG’s transition to becoming an Ethereum-native token and its role as core infrastructure for Real-World Assets (RWAs) offer some compelling long-term tailwinds. The RWA narrative continues gaining traction across crypto, which validates Centrifuge’s use case. That said, the near-term technical picture looks pretty grim, and it’s hard to get excited about upside when the charts are screaming caution.

Technical Indicators & Key Levels
The technicals aren’t doing CFG any favors right now. The 14-day RSI is hovering below neutral territory, signaling weak buying interest. Meanwhile, the 20, 50, and 100-period moving averages are all sitting above the current price, essentially forming a ceiling of resistance. Looking at the Bollinger Bands, CFG is hugging the lower band—a classic sign of downside pressure with limited breathing room unless support actually holds this time. Both the MACD and ADX are pointing toward bearish momentum, and perhaps most telling, recent price bounces haven’t been backed by meaningful volume. That’s usually not a good sign for sustainability.

Support Zones: The first line of defense sits around $0.11–$0.10, which has been tested multiple times with increasingly weak bounces. If that crumbles, the next major support area is down near $0.065–$0.070—that’s where things get really dicey.
Resistance Zones: Overhead, there’s initial resistance clustered around $0.15–$0.16, roughly where the 20-EMA and previous swing highs sit. Beyond that, you’re looking at $0.25–$0.28, which aligns with the 50 and 100 EMAs. Breaking through those levels would be needed to flip the short-term bearish bias.

Scenario Analysis
Bullish Trigger: If CFG manages to close a daily candle above $0.15 with convincing volume—meaning well above recent averages—we could see a run toward that $0.25 zone. This becomes much more likely if there’s fresh news around institutional adoption or meaningful RWA issuance flowing through Centrifuge’s platform.
Bearish Risk: Lose that $0.10 level and things could get ugly fast, potentially sending CFG down to test $0.065-$0.070. Slip below that, and we might see accelerated selling. Sure, oversold indicators could spark brief relief rallies, but the overall structure remains fragile and unconvincing.

Outlook & Expectations Over Timeframes
Short-Term (Days-to-Weeks): Realistically, expect CFG to chop around between $0.08-$0.15 with heavy resistance overhead. The technicals favor sideways action or even a drift lower unless we see a legitimate surge in volume or some protocol-specific catalyst. Oversold readings do suggest we might get some bounces, but they’ll probably be shallow and short-lived.
Medium-Term (1-3 Months): Here’s where things get more interesting. Positive developments—like increased activity in tokenizing real-world assets, clearer governance frameworks, or new utility features such as staking, fee sharing, or yield mechanisms—could genuinely shift sentiment. If Centrifuge can demonstrate actual demand and maintain healthy liquidity, a move back toward $0.25-$0.30 isn’t out of the question. But let’s be honest, it’s unlikely without broader market support. Volume growth and narrative momentum will be critical.
Long-Term (6+ Months): Ultimately, CFG’s value proposition comes down to execution. How smoothly does the V3 infrastructure rollout go? Can they successfully complete the migration? Do they secure meaningful integrations with major DeFi protocols? Most importantly, can they capture genuine demand in the increasingly competitive RWA space? There’s substantial structural risk until these questions get answered. Post-migration tokenomics pressures—inflation, emissions schedules, vesting unlocks—will play a huge role, as will regulatory developments and competition. Whether CFG becomes a leading token in the asset tokenization category or remains a niche player largely depends on these factors.

Risks & Key Monitoring Metrics
The elephant in the room is CFG’s thin liquidity. Small orders can create disproportionate price swings, which makes holding large positions genuinely risky. Add to that the broken support levels and underwhelming technical structure—like failed bounces off resistance and volume that doesn’t confirm moves—and you’ve got elevated downside risk. Inflation and vesting schedules deserve close attention, particularly if supply releases ramp up. On the flip side, any governance initiatives aimed at enhancing token utility could be meaningful positives worth watching. Keep tabs on daily trading volume, order book depth, moving average crossovers, RSI and MACD divergences or crossovers, protocol announcements related to RWA issuance, and actual utility-driven token usage like staking or reward mechanisms tied to CFG. These metrics will tell you where this is really heading.